Welcome to the CAPOS blog. you are awesome! Thank you for taking five, ten minutes reading my blogs! I appreciate YOU!

CAPOS is a unique syndrome with five equally complex symptoms: CLICK HERE to find out more


Answer to the DeafBlind Thief riddle

Hi there,

I really should be sending out an agenda for an upcoming meeting, but hey, I’m drinking a quad shot americano! Bzz bzz bzz…

Last week I posed a question (which no one answered – wah wah!) about the DeafBlind Thief.

Remember: a DeafBlind person, who is shopping with an intervenor, pockets something, let’s say a bottle of hand lotion, in a fancy, upscale store. This act could be intentional or forgetful thinking. I’m not focusing on the DeafBlind person just yet.

Last week, I posted three ways the intervenor, a DeafBlind person’s eyes & ears & guide, can react to the potential theft.

1. Says loudly, using both Signs and Voice, “… Remember the hand lotion in your pocket…”.

  • This method is good for children, persons with Alzheimers and klepto husbands in a candy store.
  • To use that way with a DeafBlind person is disempowering. The intervenor is taking away the DeafBlind person’s decision power.
  • Teaching right & wrong, pay or steal, is not an intervenor’s job.
  • The intervenor is acting like a cop.
  • This method, if I am not clear, is unacceptable.

2. Nudging, signing only, the intervenor would say “… remember the thing in your pocket …” or simple as gesturing “hand in pocket.”

  • This is method is common for friends, a co-worker with the boss’ hand-crafted coffee cup in their pocket, or youth, teenagers.
  • The DeafBlind person can either ignore the gesture or acknowledge it.
  • The intervenor would, should, do nothing more.
  • There is more empowerment, because the DeafBlind person has a choice.
  • I wouldn’t, as an intervenor, do this method.

3. The intervenor does nothing.

  • They say and do nothing, no verbal or non-herbal reminders is given to the DeafBlind person.
  • With zero reminders of the Olay in their pocket, they are in full command of the situation.
  • They are empowered to make a conscious decision to remember the Olay, or they don’t.
  • The intervenor plays no part in this theft.
  • This is the right way, in my opinion.
  • If the DeafBlind person is caught red-handed, the intervenor would facilitate communication between the manager and the DeafBlind person, in a non-judgemental way.

I hope you agree! Let me know what you think!

I’m still buzzing, but I gotta go now, thanks for breeding!

Leave a Reply

About the author

Craig MacLean is DeafBlind with ataxia, a rare condition called CAPOS. He & his wife of 22 years have two sons, the oldest of which has CAPOS as well.

Craig uses American Sign Language to communicate. He is an avid writer, friend, Hot Wheel collector and intervenor advocate.

Craig sits on many committees, boards and associations as a DeafBlind rep. He graduated university with a BA in psychology in 2000.